The most frequent Errors in SEO Competitions

I have. I've gone through all the phases: aspirant, Chosen, finalist, winner and even member of this jury on several occasions. And, believe me, watching SEO competitions from the other hand eliminates many prejudices and anxieties.

If you are one of people who think that they never win Since SEO contests are given beforehand, you're confused. Look at me, I really don't have a plug anywhere and I've managed to win sometime. In addition, I will guarantee you , at the juries I have participated in, the process was transparent, driven only by criteria of SEO quality.

However, you don't have to be innocent. Behind some of those Best-endowed prizes there are interests that have little to do with literature (at least, that is what several writers I've talked to have told me). Unfortunately, these are also tough to win. Why? Because they're introduced with professional writers. And by"professionals" I don't mean"celebrities. There are scores and scores of anonymous professional writers that are light years apart from being multimillionaires, but that live off their art just because they triumph several search engine optimization prizes per year.

That is why it's important to choose the decorations you present yourself. If you're a newcomer, how about starting with the local SEO contests? Even prizes that are in their first variants and also the participation isn't yet enormous. SEO prizes from little towns are not usually badly paid and are considerably cheaper. Or perhaps you wish to try out those in which the prize is to be published, so individuals will finally read for you. There are SEO contests of all kinds, as Víctorio Pajuo describes in this article, and based on your own objectives, you have to introduce yourself to some or others. Investigate and surprise yourself. It's going be SEO contests... there is a lot of them each month!

BUT... before you start thinking about the speech of Gratitude, ask yourself if the story you present has a true prospect of winning, because I, who have been on the other hand doing the sifting, have seen errors which you would not believe. And I'm going to tell you about them so that you do not fall to them. There they go.

ERRORS OF BULGE

1. Foundations

Carefully the rules, which can be to get something. By simply complying with them to the letter, you have a better prospect of winning than you believe. It's incredible how many people pass them . No extension, no typeface, not the subject! They send anything they want and, ale, let's see if we are lucky! And no, of course there is not. If a player does not bother to read the principles, the jury doesn't bother to read his text, that simple. That his story was good? Too bad, he sent her to the wrong contest.

2. Not knowing the principles of Spelling and grammar

It Appears obvious, but it is not: to acquire a SEO competition you Have to understand how to write. Come on, the basics: putting letters together in line with the principles of grammar and mixing words with significance. Many, many, current stories full of flaws. Tildes? Comas? Pa' what? And since the jury isn't there to decipher hieroglyphics, they're eliminated without contemplation.

When you are a jury and you have more than fifty stories

Between the unfulfilled bases as well as the faults, a large part Of the participants are left from this contest. People who pass the first sieve belong to a minority. But that is when things get complicated...

STYLISTIC ERRORS

3. Not focusing of fashion

A Fantastic writer is one who explains the complex with simple words. Whereas a bad author, or inexperienced writer, is a person who attempts to show off using a verbiage full of grandiloquent words. They reload the paragraphs in this way that it is almost impossible to know what the story is all about. I am sorry to mention that in the event that you make that mistake and the jury should get a dictionary to follow you, they won't believe you're too smart, they'll think you're too pedantic and dull.

But you don't need to go to another extreme : Simple does not mean easy. If you repeat the same words all of the time and hotel to weak verbs and inexpressive adjectives, you may also tire the jury. A story that doesn't have these stylistic mistakes makes the difference. Therefore, one of the most essential measures before submitting your story to a search engine optimization contest is to devote a good deal of time correcting your style, so the words that remain are just and necessary. You don't understand just how much the jury will thank you for this.

STRUCTURAL ERRORS

4. The beginning is boring

There is a great deal of focus on the fact that the Opening sentence has to be especially good. I don't think that it's essential for a story to be outstanding, but it shouldn't be anodyne either. And this error is especially bleeding in a short story or even a micro narrative, where every word counts. Look how difficult it is for the reader to leave you halfway when your story is barely half a page , but you will find participants who do. Too many.

Setting at a short story is usually a mistake. You likely hate it when your neighbor tells you about the weather at the elevator, especially when he warns you that it's raining when you wind up in suspenders and together with your umbrella beneath your arm. Well, the same thing happens on your story: Why does it really matter that it had been cloudy or the sun was shining?

That advice extends to novels. For frills, it is advised that everything narrated should play a part in the narrative. The external physiological descriptions, the review of all of the protagonists' clothing, the part of the time in each chapter... sleeping the reader and, don't doubt it, the jury of this SEO competition.

5. A Lousy development

Then there are the participants who have really internalized The initial shocking term, however, they are unable to maintain the level during the remaining part of the text. You can see they had a fantastic narrative, but they didn't understand how to let it. Too bad.

As Vicente Marco stated in the interview I did, "sometimes the best thought is how to tell the story. The most original argument in the world is useless if you don't elaborate the plot well. My recommendation best SEO contest uwelcome2019 is that you don't attempt to become a breaker when you have not mastered the basic tools yet. A typical well-told story will be more interesting to the jury than a very original one that is poorly developed. The jury is not likely to evaluate your own good intentions, but the last result.

Additionally, there Are people who believe that a short story is to Summarize a more story or tell an anecdote, so their text lacks story tension. Or the participants who recreate themselves in reflections with no story as SEO Contest uWelcome2019 a common thread. In all these scenarios, the issue is they haven't understood that short stories and micro stories have to have their own entity: they are not the younger brothers of a novel nor a few beautiful and deep phrases. They must tell a complete story in a couple of words, and that's where the complication is different.

6. Failed end

The terrible thing about a good beginning and a Fantastic development is That when the end isn't up to the task, it disappoints. Only those who make the three components appealing can win the prize.

What errors do novice writers often make at the end of Their stories?

Explain the narrative: Yes, even more than one can. That denotes Insecurity on the part of the author, that wishes to make it crystal clear that his story had a depth that, perhaps, the jury has not managed to see. Now, the jury can respond in two ways: if they had understood that the complexity of the story, they will ask them to describe it to them, and the participant will lose several points, or even all them; and when they hadn't seen it for themselves (and, nevertheless, it's likely that they would have liked the story), they will realise that the writer didn't understand how to transmit the thoughts he was trying to convey... and they will also subtract points from it.

Conclusion: never explain the end, make an effort to be clear through the text. Or leave doors open for each reader to think what they want, which is considerably more suggestive.

Recurring to the joke: You have to perform it nicely To ensure it is funny. The double meanings are extremely popular. What did it look like you're speaking about your girlfriend, but you're speaking to your car? Well, that's not surprising , in fact, it is possible to see it coming from afar. A narrative that's reduced to the last joke is readily forgotten, it will never remain in the head of the jury, after dozens and dozens of stories read.

Sentimentalism: Sometimes it works, however, from my standpoint View, a brief story does not give time to produce the necessary atmosphere to Move with a last twist which touches the fiber. It's dangerous, or even Of story, everything has to be very quantified in order to not cause the reverse Effect: instead of stirring, repelling.